Menu ▾ ▴

#13 GO localization_dependency -> (localizes)

closed-accepted
Kim Rutherford
None
8
2012-01-25
2011-03-31
Valerie Wood
No

Need to follow up this at some point
(and figure out how stored in Chado)
-----
email
Yep I have a bunch of these stored another way

cellular protein localization GO term and IGI with SPACxxxx
qualifier=localization_dependency
is semantically equivalent

The problem with this syntax is that it should really be evidence code IMP because although 2 genes are involved only one is mutated. When I first started doing this the annotation extension column did not exist and this was the only way I could capture the target easily.

It is possible I have some of these as
annotation_extension(localization_target(SPACxxxx) too
On 27/01/2011 19:58, Kim Rutherford wrote:
> "term=localization target Wee1; db_xref=PMID:19474789; date=20090826"

Discussion

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2011-07-05
    • assigned_to: nobody --> kim_rutherford
     

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2011-07-17
    • priority: 5 --> 8
     

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2011-11-17
    • summary: GO cellualr protein localization annotations --> GO localization_dependency -> (localizes)
     

  • Kim Rutherford

    Kim Rutherford - 2011-11-17
    • status: open --> open-accepted
     

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2011-11-28
    • status: open-accepted --> closed-accepted
     

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2011-11-28

    closing as the data is definately loaded...and numbers look OK

     

  • Kim Rutherford

    Kim Rutherford - 2012-01-09
    • status: closed-accepted --> open-accepted
     

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2012-01-25
    • status: open-accepted --> closed-accepted
     

  • Valerie Wood

    Valerie Wood - 2012-01-25

    apparently I never closed this.... closing now

     

Log in to post a comment.