Re: [pmapper-users] map2unicode question
Brought to you by:
arminburger
From: Armin B. <arm...@gm...> - 2006-12-13 13:50:56
|
yes, it's the better solution and I will change it. It remained like it is because I never have to deal with anything else than Latin1 or Unicode. The main reason to use utf8_encode was because it did not explicitly require libiconv installed as iconv functions did. But in fact, it IS required also for utf8_..code. So it makes no sense to use it. armin -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:41:28 +0100 Von: "Gambin Dejan" <Dej...@pu...> An: pma...@li... Betreff: [pmapper-users] map2unicode question > Hi, > > May I ask if there is a special reason why iconv is not being used > instead of utf8_encode for class names and description metadata? Since > iconv is used in query.php anyway, I think it is better to using it > because utf8_encode assumes the input string is in ISO-8859-1 (latin1) > encoding so it doesn't work good if the class names/description metadata > is written in different encoding. > > I was thinking about using iconv, assuming that class names/description > metadata encoding is the same as LAYER_ENCODING, so LAYER_ENCODING > metadata parameter can be used as input character set. > > regards, dejan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > pmapper-users mailing list > pma...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pmapper-users -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer |