Re: [pmapper-users] pmapper-users Digest, Vol 1, Issue 4

[Stephan H. <ste...@in...>]

Hello *,

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:07:43 -0700
pma...@li... wrote:

> essage: 8
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:11:02 +0200
> From: Armin Burger <arm...@gm...>
> Subject: Re: [pmapper-users] bug in pmapper 2.1.1
> To: Alessandro Pasotti <al...@ti...>
> Cc: pma...@li...
> Message-ID: <453...@gm...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed
>=20
> I uploaded version 2.1.2 with this bug fix and one for Postgis layers.

I will not stress it too much again, but I have some questions
regarding the pmapper-development strategies for upcoming releases.

Currently there are at least 2 mailinglist (sourceforge, faunalia),
probably some more at wald?!
Which one is the 'master' mailinglist? We should=20

I would like to see a concentration of our power to one list, one SVN,
one tracker, one wiki, one whateverweneed.

This will definetly bring p.mapper to a wider range of people. As Paolo
also mentioned this will help bugfixes/extensions/scripts apply to
upstream version managed by Armin.

I know it was discussed thousand times, but why dont we use a
centratlized source-code storage, e.g. at sourceforge or wald? This
would make lots of things easier and p.mapper would definetly benefit
from this approach.

just my 0.02=A2

Cheers
	Stephan

--=20
Stephan Holl   : www.intevation.de/~stephan | GISpatcher:
www.gispatcher.de Intevation GmbH: www.intevation.de          | GAV
e.V.: www.grass-verein.de Georgstr.4     : 49074 Osnabr=FCck            |=
=20