From: Rafael L. <rla...@us...> - 2004-12-04 11:58:09
|
* mj...@ga... <mj...@ga...> [2004-12-03 20:25]: > Alan W. Irwin writes: > > The present default width is fine, but the commit message, > > > > "Make the PostScript linewidth a multiple of DEF_WIDTH" > > > > occurred relatively recently (on 2004/01/28). If I am interpreting this > > message correctly (I am too tired/busy to look at code like I should), then > > in terms of the old width we only have 3,6,9, etc. available to us now > > which I think is too coarse. > > Oh ok.. I see the problem -- > > int width = > (pls->width < MIN_WIDTH) ? DEF_WIDTH : > (pls->width > MAX_WIDTH) ? MAX_WIDTH : DEF_WIDTH * pls->width; > > Ouch. Agreed, this has to go. I did this change because the result of the ps driver was visually incoherent with those of the other drivers. The most blatant example of this occurs with x02.c. However, I agree that a resolution of 3 pt for line widths is way too coarse for the ps driver. The problem is: how could we revert my change above and keep coherent visual results across all drivers? -- Rafael |