Thread: Use of Language (was RE: [Plib-devel] Re: KobayashiMaru & plib)
Brought to you by:
sjbaker
From: Fay J. F C. AAC/W. <joh...@eg...> - 2000-08-21 17:22:26
|
Folks, While I hesitate to do this as a relative newcomer to the list, I feel that I need to put in a plug for decent language. Four-letter Anglo-Saxon words are not only offensive (at least to me, personally), but they are also unprofessional. I also have a job-related interest in the matter: I have a ".mil" address, and every byte that comes in or goes out is monitored. I don't want to have to explain to the computer security people why I am subscribed to this sort of a mailing list. John F. Fay joh...@eg... -----Original Message----- From: Sam Stickland [mailto:sa...@sp...] Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 10:41 To: pli...@li... Subject: Re: [Plib-devel] Re: KobayashiMaru & plib ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Baker" <sjb...@ai...> To: <pli...@li...> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 9:26 AM Subject: Re: [Plib-devel] Re: KobayashiMaru & plib > > > > But do you really believe that as a beginner 3D programmer, you will manage to > > > write a single game that spans deep space PLUS flight sim PLUS hand-to-hand > > > combat and integrates all those seamlessly? Not one single game throughout > > > the entire history of game making has ever been that ambitious. Not one. > Utterly universal game engines don't exist because they can't exist. > There is a galaxy of difference between a first person shooter game > engine like Quake or Doom and a flight simulation engine like FlightGear. > The idea that you can just change the model and program some different > behaviours in is very naive. Well, I wasn't going to jump in here, but in the end I thought "what the hell"... In terms of outdoor and indoor environments being mixed in a single game you could cite Descent 3. This game - supposedly (I haven't seen any truely techy articles on it), managed to successfully mix an outdoor engine, with an indoor portal culling engine. At the time it was described as a "tremondous technical feat" :) So, I don't believe that it's actually impossible - merely just incredibly difficult. I'm working on a similar game to KobayashiMaru myself, but I understand the technical challenges involved and I don't expect to ever fully complete the project. I'm tackling it in stages, creating the neccessary technology at each stage to complete those goals. So to begin with I have a straight up space-shooter (and this has taken me long enough! :). I'm currently in the process of taking the network code from this and rewriting it into a separate generic library (something I should had done from the start, but hey, we live and learn). The network library (to my surprise), is turning out to be quite powerful :) . From an API point of view you can just subclass new objects from the base one provided, and effectively do: STNetworkObj *obj = new STNetworkObj ; obj -> SetPos ( blah ) ; NetworkEnv::AddNewObj ( obj ) ; ( Obviously it's a bit more complex than that. In actuallality your subclassed objects have to specify which of their data-variables are to be transmitted over the network, what accuracy they require (this can be range based) etc. Objects can also be placed in classes and assigned relative strengths. For example, you might have a scanning class - into which you can place scanners and jammers. The network engine works out what information the client *should* know about and transmit only that). The network library shields all the nasty dead-reckoning, time-sync, latency and path extropolation problems at it's highest level. This isn't fantasy. I have this code base working, and I'll have small programs to demonstrate the library ready in the coming months (starting with network Pong! and getting more complex). Now, this is only a very tiny part of what a game like KobayashiMaru would need to achieve - and this has taken me 18 months to get this far. :) When the network library is fully debugged, I plan on adding a basic trading mechanism to SpaceThing - and the amount of spare time I have at the moment (maybe I'll have to stay in more), this will be a while. After that I need to add a persistant database to the server-side of the network library. God knows how long that will take! From my point of view it's a bit of fun, and I get nice side programs at every stage - even it is shitty Pong! :) Well, that appears to be enough of a ramble/blanant plug for my network library. Sam _______________________________________________ plib-devel mailing list pli...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/plib-devel |
From: Sam S. <sa...@sp...> - 2000-08-21 17:31:20
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Fay John F Contr AAC/WMG" <joh...@eg...> To: <pli...@li...> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 6:21 PM Subject: Use of Language (was RE: [Plib-devel] Re: KobayashiMaru & plib) > Folks, > While I hesitate to do this as a relative newcomer to the list, I > feel that I need to put in a plug for decent language. Four-letter > Anglo-Saxon words are not only offensive (at least to me, personally), but > they are also unprofessional. I also have a job-related interest in the > matter: I have a ".mil" address, and every byte that comes in or goes out > is monitored. I don't want to have to explain to the computer security > people why I am subscribed to this sort of a mailing list. Sorry, it won't happen again. I tend to work in a fairly causal atmosphere, and my ..ah.. background probably doesn't make me assign the sort of severity to these words that other people might. Sam |
From: Steve B. <sjb...@ai...> - 2000-08-21 22:56:02
|
Sam Stickland wrote: > > While I hesitate to do this as a relative newcomer to the list, I > > feel that I need to put in a plug for decent language. Four-letter > > Anglo-Saxon words are not only offensive (at least to me, personally), but > > they are also unprofessional. I also have a job-related interest in the > > matter: I have a ".mil" address, and every byte that comes in or goes out > > is monitored. I don't want to have to explain to the computer security > > people why I am subscribed to this sort of a mailing list. > > Sorry, it won't happen again. I tend to work in a fairly causal atmosphere, and my ..ah.. background probably doesn't make me > assign the sort of severity to these words that other people might. In the end this is an unmoderated list with open membership - to expect there to never be the odd expletif creeping in is unrealistic. I don't think anything *too* unacceptable is going on here. I also work in a military (contractor admittedly) environment and every byte is also theoretically monitored - but I don't think they'd really bat an eyelid about other people's language. Of course if it was me who was cursing up a storm - that would be a different matter. -- Steve Baker HomeEmail: <sjb...@ai...> WorkEmail: <sj...@li...> HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1 Projects : http://plib.sourceforge.net http://tuxaqfh.sourceforge.net http://tuxkart.sourceforge.net http://prettypoly.sourceforge.net |
From: Alexander R. <a_r...@in...> - 2000-08-22 06:53:25
|
Hi, I know very well that what I will do now will very probably get me flamed or being in put in the killfile of many/some in this list. But this was something I couldn't stand. Fay John F Contr AAC/WMG wrote: > > Folks, > While I hesitate to do this as a relative newcomer to the list, I > feel that I need to put in a plug for decent language. Four-letter > Anglo-Saxon words are not only offensive (at least to me, personally), but Love. Hell. Sexy. Fuck. Bomb. Iraq. Nuke. Sperm. Dick. XMas. Which one do you mean? > they are also unprofessional. I also have a job-related interest in the > matter: I have a ".mil" address, and every byte that comes in or goes out If you are afraid of loosing your job or getting into trouble, you should better receive this mailing-list at our private mail account, not at your job account. If you receive it at your private account, no one will monitor you and you are completely free to do what _you_ want. AND you don't waste the time and money of your employers by reading private mail in working time. OR - even better - you should quit your job at once. > is monitored. I don't want to have to explain to the computer security > people why I am subscribed to this sort of a mailing list. So, do you have the Gestapo on your back? Alex from good old Germany, just got his Deja Vu -- Alexander Rawass Email: ale...@us... Project Homepage: http://kobayashimaru.sourceforge.net ...but some day you'll be a STAR in somebody else's SKY... |