Re: [Plib-users] building on ubuntu linux 6.10, gcc 4.1.2
Brought to you by:
sjbaker
|
From: Jan R. <slo...@gm...> - 2006-11-09 21:37:43
|
Am Thu, 9 Nov 2006 21:30:02 -0000 schrieb "Stuart McDonald" <stu...@bl...>:
> class name in the destructor i.e. it has
>
> ssgaCloudLayerList::~ssgaCloudLayerList() { ...
>
> when it could just have
>
> ~ssagaCloudLayerList() { ...
Hello,
I've seen problems like this with other programs as well, always
when using the gcc4 compiler where gcc3 always worked without
warnings. Is this feature (no class name needed for the dtor)
new to the C++ standard or has C++ always been like this and the
existing compilers simply did not complain?
I'm not a C++ expert but I've always learned to put the class
name in front of every single method of a class...
Kind regards,
Jan R.
--
Jan Reucker
email: jan dot reucker at web dot de
web: http://www.reucker-online.de
|