[Plib-users] Re: sgCompareVec* documented incorrectly?

[<lo...@sl...>]

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 pli...@li... wrote:

>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. sgCompareVec* documented incorrectly? (lo...@sl...)
>    2. Re: sgCompareVec* documented incorrectly? (Wolfram Kuss)

>
> <lo...@sl...> wrote:
>
> >Please correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> You are right. There was already some discussion about this, starting
> at:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/1868/2001/5/200/5737189/
> IMHO, we should create a new function and deprecate (sp?) the old one.
> Unfortunately, some of us are just now quite busy with PPE ...

Somewhat off-topic but the geocrawler search engine apparently sucks.  If
you search for sgCompareVec or sgCompareVec2 you get no results.  Yet
sgCompareVec2 is clearly in the message you pointed me to...

Something for everyone to remember when looking for old PLIB messages.

Jeff Long