RE: [Plib-devel] Any resolution on the license?

[Dave M. <Dav...@dy...>]

i was in favor of leaving the license as LGPL and placing NDA calls outside
plib using function overrides or hooks.  this keeps the plib project
flexible and improving.  i also don't think the developer is responsible for
supplying the end-user with the compilation tools and SDKs.  it that was
true, much opensource would be in trouble.  if someone can explain why this
approach does not comply with the terms of the LGPL in spirit and law, i
would appreciate it.  i'm doing console development using plib.

BTW: someone on opengl-gamedev posted this link for opengl on the PS2
console:
http://www.dataplus.co.jp/OpenGL4ps2.html

--Dave McClurg

> I think I read all of the messages about changing the
> license for use in embedded things (consoles, etc...),
> but I don't recall what the final outcome of that 
> discussion was.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul