Re: [Plib-devel] Releasing PLIB 1.2 *soon*.

[Eero P. <epa...@ko...>]

Steve Baker wrote:
> 

> So, if the library is a DLL, he can do that - but there is a
> good chance that if he does, the program will crash because
> of the C++ issues.
> 

I really don't yet know if this would work. Almost certainly
it would only work within a certain family of compilers.
Anyways I think it would satisfy at least the letter
of the LGPL. (And it would not be any worse than
distributing application .o files). Btw I am not
100% sure how inline functions behave regarding
LGPL. Certainly they cannot be updated if the
"client program" is not distributed as source code.
(I know the license mentions inline funcs)


Assuming that this could be implemented for WIN32
with an external .def file, would you include the 
.def file into plid distribution?



		Eero