RE: [Plib-devel] Releasing PLIB 1.2 *soon*.

[Paul B. <pbl...@di...>]

Steve Baker says:
>
> I'm really opposed to this.
> 
> 1) It makes an ugly mess of the source code.
> 
> 2) There is no sense in using PLIB as a shared library and encouraging
>    people to do so will greatly increase my maintenance burden.
> 
> Please don't add it to the CVS.

 
I agree with Steve on this.  Making shared libraries out of C++
class libraries is asking for a large amount of hurt.  Especially
with all of the SSG_API (or other) preprocessor macros that would
be required.

Paul