Re: [Plib-users] Including string.h in library headers.

[Steve B. <sjb...@ai...>]

David Williams wrote:
> 
> Is there any reason why ssg.h and js.h don't include string.h themselves,
> since(at least under recent Linux Distributions) it is needed to define
> memcpy?

Nope - it's a simple oversight.

I'll fix it.

> Pretty much the library expects you to define some functions that it uses
> internally(and which you shouldn't need to worry about as a user), prior
> to even including the library headers.

Since most main programs use <string.h> somewhere - and therefore include
it themselves, I doubt that anyone noticed this drop-off before.

Good catch!  Thanks.
 
> Does anyone know if that would break out of the box compiles of the
> library on any systems?

No - it shouldn't.
 
-- 
Steve Baker   HomeEmail: <sjb...@ai...>
              WorkEmail: <sj...@li...>
              HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
              Projects : http://plib.sourceforge.net
                         http://tuxaqfh.sourceforge.net
                         http://tuxkart.sourceforge.net
                         http://prettypoly.sourceforge.net