RE: [Plib-devel] Re: [BUG] puComboBox broken since recent puInput Base commit?

[Fay J. F Dr C. U. AFSEO/SK <joh...@eg...>]

Bram,

	The only difference between a deprecated "pu*****" class and its
"puAux" equivalent is the addition of the letter "a".

Everybody else,

	We are gathered here to remove the deprecated classes from the CVS
tree of PUI.  If any man know just cause as to why these classes should not
be removed, speak now, or else forever hold your peace.

John F. Fay
Technical Fellow, Jacobs/Sverdrup TEAS Group
850-729-6330
joh...@eg...
 
-----Original Message-----
From: pli...@li...
[mailto:pli...@li...] On Behalf Of Bram Stolk
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:06 PM
To: pli...@li...
Subject: Re: [Plib-devel] Re: [BUG] puComboBox broken since recent puInput
Base commit?

Fay John F Dr CTR USAF AFSEO/SK wrote:
> OK, I think the time has come to cut the Gordian knot.  The "puComboBox" 
> class has been deprecated for more than two years and Bram finds that 
> it doesn't work when the "puAux" equivalent does work.  Let us delete it.
> 

Ok, I ripped obsolete classes from my working copy.
Do you want me to commit it to the repo?

I fixed all examples/ and most demos/
(Not yet demos/p-guide... as I wasnt sure how to handle that one)

Remaining issue: docs
Do all obsolete puFoo classes have a puaFoo equivalent?
If so, is the API the same?

   Bram