RE: [Plib-devel] [BUG] Minor bug in ulClock

[Fay J. F C. AAC/W. <joh...@eg...>]

Gentlemen,
 
    Not hearing any screams of anguish, I am changing "ul.h" to set the
"delta" variable in "ulClock::reset()" to 0.0000001 instead of 1.0/30.0 .
This makes the reset function consistent with the update function.
 

John F. Fay
Technical Fellow, Jacobs/Sverdrup TEAS Group
joh...@eg...
850-729-6330 

 

  _____  

From: pli...@li...
[mailto:pli...@li...] On Behalf Of Fay John F
Contr AAC/WMG
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 12:06 PM
To: pli...@li...
Subject: RE: [Plib-devel] [BUG] Minor bug in ulClock



Joerg, 

        Thank you very much for spotting that.  I am putting the fix into
CVS.  I also set "now" to zero seconds in reset(), making it consistently
"seconds since reset" instead of starting out being "seconds since epoch"
and then changing.

Folks, 

        Is there a reason we shouldn't set "delta" in "reset()" to 0.0000001
(its minimum value in update() ) rather than 1.0 / 30.0 ?  I value the
consistency, which I would consider a good enough reason to change it.

John F. Fay 
Technical Fellow, Jacobs/Sverdrup TEAS Group 
850-729-6330 
joh...@eg...