Re: [Plib-devel] On First Looking Into Baker's SSG (with apologie s to John Keats)

[Wolfram K. <w_...@rz...>]

Hi

>	I might add that my questions and comments are exactly
>those--questions and comments.  I am just giving SSG a first look, and I=
 am
>not in a position to be ordering policy to anybody in this regard.  My
>thought was to draw attention to things that don't look right. =20

I think this is a good idea, since you do the work to look at ssg
anyway, so pointing out those things to someone with write access (or
someone to double check your ideas) makes sense. And I agree that
trivial things should be fixed as well, if they are trivial to fix.


>(4) No, I am not sure about changing the instructions on lines 42-43 of
>"ssgconf.h". =20

=46ixed. Somehow, yesterday I was obviously able to confuse myself over
this issue completely. Thanks for the clarification.

>(9) Let me see if I understand the issues.  (I haven't gotten to
>"ssgKidList" yet.)  In "ssgList", the function "removeAllEntities" calls
>"removeEntity" for each entry in the list.  Apparently "ssgKidList" =
inherits
>from "ssgList" and does other things in its "removeEntity" besides what
>"ssgList" does.  In this case, it would be necessary to call
>"ssgKidList::removeEntity" when removing all the entities from a
>"ssgKidList".  As such, the "ssgList::removeAllEntities" may as well =
stay as
>it is (with the change you put in to remove from the top instead of the
>bottom).

Yes, correct.

>John F. Fay
>joh...@eg...

Bye bye,
Wolfram.