From: Paul O. <new...@ki...> - 2005-02-17 09:03:38
|
Paul Osmialowski wrote: > My tests showed that on 2.4.x kernels this > nanosleep avoids system load to go high (actually, on 2.6.x system load > doesn't go that high even without that nanosleep). I've forgotten to mention, that problems with load aren't noticable when you use only one framegrabber card. I had to operate six fg's at the same time so I had to fight for system interactivity, nanosleep in that place was enouhg solution. Paul |