Re: [Pipmak-Users] Different patches positioning

[Andrea V. <and...@gm...>]

Christian Walther <cwalther <at> gmx.ch> writes:

I had loosed this your reply,

Ok, probably you are on right.

I have to investigate more about patch positioning...
I'm little confused now.
I'm thinking also about solution of patch image reusing..

But what about different rendering of not-trasparent and trasparent PNG 
(see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.games.devel.pipmak.devel/76 )?

Well, the next revision of autocubic will be totally different, 
because it will use 3d positioning (that it was a my request, remember?)

For the moment I am working on object3d which I mentioned on the wiki, 
and 3d patch positioning seems work correctly, with just a strange behaviour...
if I move a patch through faces edges, it leave a track on 
the background images...
it seems a behavior like in official 0.2.6 when you put a patch outside a face.
but i want to investigate more before propose to you an example.

Bye.

Andrea