Re: [Pipmak-Users] Linked libraries
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
cwalther
From: Christian W. <cwa...@gm...> - 2007-12-03 17:51:20
|
> I take back what I said before about the window edge resistance with > the mouse grabbing, because I stopped having trouble with it when I used > the pre-compiled executable which has the physfs library staticly linked in. Are you sure that's caused by Physfs? I have no idea why that would have anything to do with it... > But I also wanted to know why the Pipmak source documentation says to > compile Lua yourself instead of using a package from your distribution. No specific reason. I just assumed that Lua and Physfs were less likely to be available as packages from a distribution than SDL and the other dependencies. Plus they're easy to build without having to install them and link in statically. > So, would it make a difference if I just used the Lua5 package from > Debian, instead of getting the official source from the Lua project? If you have Lua 5.0.x, I don't think so. Lua 5.1 has some small changes in the language, but I assume it should work as well. For the official release I've deferred updating to it until version 0.3, when backwards compatibility can be broken. -Christian |