Re: [Pipmak-Users] Patch rotation proposal

[Andrea V. <and...@gm...>]

Christian Walther <cwalther <at> gmx.ch> writes:


> Apparently not. There's no anchor_nx etc., only anchorx and anchory, and 
> they designate a point in the patch plane, measured in patch pixels from 
> the top left corner of the patch image. Maybe we should call these 
> coordinates something other than "x" and "y" to distinguish them from 
> the background image pixel coordinates (x, y) and normalized 3D 
> coordinates (nx, ny, nz), since they live in a completely different 
> space. Maybe "h", "v" for horizontal and vertical? "r", "d" for right 
> and down? Any ideas?

Ok, now I have understood.
Maybe h and v are better than x and y.
I think that the interface to the arbitrary placement of patch corners in 3D
is quite complete, isn't it?

> > but I always get the message:
> > 
> > Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0"
>

I found that DRI is supported only on AGP version of  Matrox G400....
...obviously I have the PCI version!!!

But I don't know if that it's only a warning message and the real error is 
the other "undefined symbol: SDL_RWFromConstMem", because for a while 
appear the pipmak window (but with black background).
I have to retry updating the SDL library....


A bad note: I tryed pipmak on a IBM Thinkpad with WinXP but 
it crash immediately also without any project loaded....
but there are also other program that doesn't work...like pinnacle TV center
that sends the machine in Blue Screen...

Ciao

Andrea
  
Ciao

Andrea