Re: [Pipmak-Devel] Pipmak IDE & integrated authoring

[Fabrizio P. <fpi...@li...>]

Hello,

Christian Wrote
> Looks nice so far, apart from the non-alpha-blended and cut-off icons 
> and some other rough edges. What I don't get at first sight is, what is=
 
> the conceptual difference between the buttons and the hyperlinks?
 
Aesthetic only, but I've seen is not a good choice...

> I can certainly see this as being a useful tool when it's done, so in 
> that regard I encourage you to continue with it. But you should know 
> that my own goal is to make this obsolete - all editing should be 
> possible in Pipmak itself one day (more about that below).
> 
> What I'm not sure I'm comfortable with is the Pipmak logo at the top of=
 
> the window. It should be made clear that this is not an official part o=
f 
> Pipmak, but an independent project.

Don't mind, it's only a conceptual project I've made it in few hours. No =
problem than, it's a good occasion for me to make practice with C++

> Can you explain what would be better with an integrated text editor tha=
n 
> with the current system of launching the external editor of the user's =

> choice? (Apart from the possibility of having an integrated debugger, 
> which would probably be quite a lot of work to implement.)

Ops! I was referring only to lines 189-190 in "pipmak_windows.c". I've co=
mpiled SciTE in no time without problems and the only dependence is scint=
illa.
Sorry to have created confusion!

> Make a branch and give you write access to it? That would still leave m=
e 
> the work of merging changes from the branch to the trunk. I'd rather 
> give you write access to the trunk as soon as I'm confident enough that=
 
> your patches conform to my standards and can be committed without 
> needing postprocessing by me.
> 
> ("You" in that paragraph refers to Andrea and Fabrizio in particular, 
> but also to any other potential contributor.)
> 
> Of course we could also start some experiments with one of the 
> decentralized revision control systems that have cropped up lately - 
> I've never used any of them so far. Might be interesting.
> 
> Nothing stops one developer from testing patches by another one before =

> they go into SVN. As I already mentioned, the natural tool for this 
> purpose would be the patch tracker on SourceForge: 
><http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=3D112801&atid=3D663294>.

As you want Christian. I was just wondering if was a way to share easily =
the modified code without interfere with the official version. 

Regards, Fabrizio.=0A=0A=0A----------------------------------------------=
--------=0AScegli infostrada: ADSL gratis per tutta l=92estate e telefoni=
 senza canone Telecom=0Ahttp://click.libero.it/infostrada=0A