Re: Image Sequences-why not suitable?
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
cwalther
From: James W. <jfc...@ya...> - 2009-09-11 17:43:39
|
I meant a JPEG sequence, sorry for any confusion. --- On Thu, 9/10/09, Aidan Gauland <wgs...@no...> wrote: From: Aidan Gauland <wgs...@no...> Subject: Re: Image Sequences-why not suitable? To: "Content creation for the Pipmak Game Engine" <pip...@li...> Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 4:28 PM James Wilson wrote: > Really? Interesting. I rendered a 1024x1024 video, encoded it to 85% quality JPEG, and set it up in Pipmak. It worked fine, and ran on the intended 15 FPS. And my PC is fairly old, 1.9 GHz. Do you mean a sequence of JPEG images, or is there some way of making an animated JPEG that I don't know about? I thought that JPEG was only for still images. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Pipmak-Users mailing list Pip...@li... news://news.gmane.org/gmane.games.devel.pipmak.user https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pipmak-users |