Re: Image Sequences-why not suitable?

[Aidan G. <wgs...@no...>]

James Wilson wrote:
> Really? Interesting. I rendered a 1024x1024 video, encoded it to 85% quality JPEG, and set it up in Pipmak. It worked fine, and ran on the intended 15 FPS. And my PC is fairly old, 1.9 GHz.

Do you mean a sequence of JPEG images, or is there some way of making an 
animated JPEG that I don't know about?  I thought that JPEG was only for still 
images.