From: Aidan G. <wgs...@ih...> - 2008-10-21 06:35:13
|
Works just the same for me. I'll start changing my project to make use of this feature. This should make things much clearer (Lua code in particular). Christian Walther wrote: > I just committed support for named nodes as revision 209. This is quite > an invasive change, but if I made no mistakes, it should be backwards > compatible with existing projects, unless they do weird things like > relying on node:getid() returning a number (it's a string now) or using > "../" in paths in different places than once at the beginning (its > semantics have changed, it's a real "up one level" command now). > > Therefore, I'd appreciate if those who are set up for building from SVN > could check this out and run it through its paces with their projects, > to see if I broke anything. Updated documentation is available at > <http://pipmak.sourceforge.net/Reference.pdf>, to see what's changed > refer to > <http://pipmak.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pipmak/trunk/pipmak/documentation/Reference.tex?r1=209&r2=208&pathrev=209>. > > -Christian |