Re: Module system

[Christian W. <cwa...@gm...>]

Andrea Viarengo wrote:
> yes, probably "named nodes" are a better solution...
> 
> A part the implementation, 
> I have understood you like the addition of modules/plugin in Pipmak, right?

Yes, that seems like a good idea. I have a rough plan in my head and 
will try to work it out once the "named nodes" thing is done. Speaking 
of which, I have a prototype working (in a backwards-compatible way) at 
this moment, but it still needs more rigorous testing, and updated 
documentation.

  -Christian