Re: [Pinky-develop] Union updated

[Mircea C. <mi...@ne...>]

Using "feed" as a prefix for the PiNKY accessors seems perfect for me.

--Mircea

On 2/27/07, Peter Rodgers <dr...@us...> wrote:
>
> Maybe active:pinkyXXXX is still too opaque.  What about using the
> resource model as the prefix?
>
> active:feedUnion
> active:feedForEachEntry
> active:feedFetch
>
> etc.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Pinky-develop mailing list
> Pin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pinky-develop
>



-- 
Cheers,
--Mircea