Re: [Pinky-develop] Union updated

[Brian S. <br...@bo...>]

On Feb 27, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Peter Rodgers wrote:

> active:Union  -> active:pinkyUnion
> active:ForEachEntry -> active:pinkyForEachEntry
>
> The reason for this is that a prefix can be useful to indicate the
> interoperability of a tool ecosystem.  See, for example, the
> active:sqlXXXX set of accessors or  active:rdfXXXX etc.

I like this idea.