From: julio s. <jm...@ma...> - 2003-04-25 19:00:46
|
Hi! Scott Wallace wrote: > (+ (int %1) 5) > > yep! it works, thanks. > the problem is that linked fields are viewed as strings, not their >original data type, so you need to somehow convert them back to their >original type. I'd like to fix this problem at its root, but it would >require a new database format, and it would be pretty hard to make it >robust. > Now I' m curious. Your explanation and solution seems good to me. I only desire to solve all software problems with that kind of rational and no adhoc solution! So - are there a real *problem*? Sure, user have some work to do (writing 5 more characters :-) but now I believe that a good glance on doc files (blushing) would be enough. BTW - I hope that such elucidation is already on docs because I believe that my attempt with linked fields is trivial... and lots of users appreciate documentation-for-dumbs (blushing again) Thanks again, Julio |