From: Fab <kr...@bi...> - 2001-11-05 21:45:34
|
> - implement a field type of "null" or "label" which did not actually > have a data item in each record, but would be displayed in the record > table using only its name. I agree with this one. But I think that creating a special label for displaying each field would be simplier than a special syntax. So instead of : > field "Foo" label > field "[Foo] Number" integer > field "[Foo] Size" integer we could have : > field "Foo" label > field "Foo Number" integer "Number" > field "Foo Size" integer "Size" which would be described by : field <Field_Name> <Field_Type> <Field_Label> Fab. |