From: Carson W. <car...@ya...> - 2001-09-24 13:46:07
|
At Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:07:18 +0200 , "Chalain Marc" <mar...@vo...> wrote: >Sorry, but an octal integer is an integer as a decimal integer. That's fine Marc, I believe that's how it should be. >My problem is if a transform Integer Type Field in Decimal Type Field after some body will want to have the Hexadecimal Type Field and the Octal Type Field, and after a new field to convert one in another type. >But in every case the first 0 will never be keeped, and integer is a value not a string, if you want to keep 0123 you must select a String Type Field!!! That's what I meant to say, sorry if I missed. >For the Calculated Type Field, it's another problem. It's a very hard feature. I don't know if i will able to implement it in the next version. But i keep the idea to add it. That's fine, when ever you can. Thanks, Carson >Salut, >Marc. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com |