From: Tom D. <td...@vg...> - 2000-04-12 18:57:49
|
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Hal DeVore wrote: > All depends on the conduit and the "granularity" of the sync. > With memos, an entire memo is an "item" for syncing. With the > datebook an individual appointment is an "item". Implied. I did a modification to a phone book entry on my Palm III and the desktop and just the entry itself was duplicated. > Conceptually there doesn't seem any reason that an individual > database RECORD couldn't be the "item". Easy for me to say > since I've never done any Palm or conduit development. But then the duplication problem still exists. If user modified a record and Larry provides an update, then the entry will be duplicated and user will have to resolve. Also, this assumes a HotSync conduit for DB that can store in a file format where it knows each record from the next. Tom |