From: Jamil A. <its...@gm...> - 2006-01-15 15:46:16
|
Hi, Any estimate of the release date? Best, `Jamil |
From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2006-01-15 18:50:39
|
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:47:01PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote: > Hi, > > Any estimate of the release date? > > Best, > `Jamil There was some talk of having it at the end of last week. I'm not strongly opposed to doing so this week. * We ought to get the saved state from the drop down working first. * We do need some UI for seeing which account is in an error state. luke |
From: Mark D. <ma...@ki...> - 2006-01-15 20:14:31
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:50:36 -0500, Luke Schierer wrote > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:47:01PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote: > > Any estimate of the release date? > > There was some talk of having it at the end of last week. I'm not > strongly opposed to doing so this week. Do we need another beta? > We ought to get the saved state from the drop down working first. What do you mean? > We do need some UI for seeing which account is in an error state. I agree. -Mark |
From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2006-01-15 20:38:02
|
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:14:19PM -0500, Mark Doliner wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:50:36 -0500, Luke Schierer wrote > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:47:01PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote: > > > Any estimate of the release date? > > > > There was some talk of having it at the end of last week. I'm not > > strongly opposed to doing so this week. > > Do we need another beta? I'd like another beta because I think we are more than a week away from 2.0.0, yet for us to have a decent chance of making the ubuntu dapper release, I'm told we need to have something they can package this week. I'm told they can move from having a beta to having true 2.0.0 more easily than 1.5.0 to 2.0.0. I'm also seeing distros packaging the existing beta and/or being pushed to do so. If packaging of the beta is going to continue, I'd rather it not be beta1, the noteworthy flaws of which we already know at this point. > > > We ought to get the saved state from the drop down working first. > > What do you mean? I have a number of saved states. 6 of them show in the drop down list. the top one is ALWAYS the one called "Default" If I start gaim into Default, I can select some other state. It will enter that state (based on what the instances of me in my buddy list reflect), but the selector will still show Default. Default will also remain the top most entry in the list of saved states. Sometimes selecting a different state, somewhere below Default, will work. Sometimes it doesn't. Selecting Default never works, I must go to the saved state dialog to use it. luke > > > We do need some UI for seeing which account is in an error state. > > I agree. > > -Mark > |
From: Mark D. <ma...@ki...> - 2006-01-15 22:42:30
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:37:57 -0500, Luke Schierer wrote > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:14:19PM -0500, Mark Doliner wrote: > > Do we need another beta? > > I'd like another beta because I think we are more than a week away > from 2.0.0, yet for us to have a decent chance of making the ubuntu > dapper release, I'm told we need to have something they can package > this week. I'm told they can move from having a beta to having true > 2.0.0 more easily than 1.5.0 to 2.0.0. I'm also seeing distros > packaging the existing beta and/or being pushed to do so. If > packaging of the beta is going to continue, I'd rather it not be > beta1, the noteworthy flaws of which we already know at this point. Alright, well let's figure out a way to show the error state this week and try to release a beta on Friday. > I have a number of saved states. 6 of them show in the drop down > list. the top one is ALWAYS the one called "Default" If I start > gaim into Default, I can select some other state. It will enter that > state (based on what the instances of me in my buddy list reflect), > but the selector will still show Default. Default will also remain > the top most entry in the list of saved states. Sometimes selecting > a different state, somewhere below Default, will work. Sometimes it > doesn't. Selecting Default never works, I must go to the saved state > dialog to use it. Interesting. I'll try to look into it and see if I can reproduce some of this (but not until Wednesday night, at the earliest). FYI the list of popular statuses isn't strictly most-recently-used. It is most-recently-used and weighted by the number of times the saved status has been used since it was created. -Mark |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2006-01-16 00:12:53
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Doliner wrote: > Do we need another beta? I would like one since gaim-bnet causes segfault with beta1 but works fine with CVS HEAD. - -- Don Seiler do...@se... Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFC87F041 Fingerprint: 0B56 50D5 E91E 4D4C 83B7 207C 76AC 5DA2 FC87 F041 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDyuTodqxdovyH8EERAjgsAJ9jPVOHxmBJ6m4BJfbsJcSVGT+l7wCgjkgQ 55bABSDInI7pQ6voCVB4T8Q= =H6Y8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |