|
From: Mark D. <ma...@ki...> - 2006-10-10 04:19:51
|
Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. I mean, I guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very often anymore, but he is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. I was against giving him CVS access many moons ago because I felt like some of his patches were shots in the dark, and I still get that vibe a little bit... but I think he's done a lot of good work, and we could use more active devs. What do other people think? -Mark |
|
From: Etan R. <de...@ed...> - 2006-10-10 04:30:42
|
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Mark Doliner wrote: > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer > status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. I mean, I > guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very often anymore, but he > is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. > > I was against giving him CVS access many moons ago because I felt like some of > his patches were shots in the dark, and I still get that vibe a little bit... > but I think he's done a lot of good work, and we could use more active devs. > > What do other people think? > > -Mark I agree with everything here. -Etan |
|
From: Sean E. <sea...@gm...> - 2006-10-10 04:35:58
|
On 10/9/06, Etan Reisner <de...@ed...> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Mark Doliner wrote: > > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer > > status? > > What do other people think? > I agree with everything here. Me too. I've been considering him "full developer." I guess he's not in the About Box or contactinfo.php or anything, though. I'm for it. -s. |
|
From: Mark D. <ma...@ki...> - 2006-10-10 04:49:32
|
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:24:49 -0500, Mark Doliner wrote > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer > status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. > I mean, I guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very > often anymore, but he is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. > > I was against giving him CVS access many moons ago because I felt > like some of his patches were shots in the dark, and I still get > that vibe a little bit... but I think he's done a lot of good work, > and we could use more active devs. > > What do other people think? > > -Mark Oh look, sadrul is on this mailing list. I'm glad I didn't say anything negative :-) -Mark |
|
From: Sadrul H C. <im...@gm...> - 2006-10-11 16:41:37
|
On 10/10/06, Mark Doliner <ma...@ki...> wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:24:49 -0500, Mark Doliner wrote > > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full > developer > > status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. > > I mean, I guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very > > often anymore, but he is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. > > > > I was against giving him CVS access many moons ago because I felt > > like some of his patches were shots in the dark, and I still get > > that vibe a little bit... but I think he's done a lot of good work, > > and we could use more active devs. > > > > What do other people think? Thanks to everyone for your support! I really appreciate it. I do sometimes shoot in the dark. I think I'll try to keep that in check :) Oh look, sadrul is on this mailing list. I'm glad I didn't say anything > negative :-) I wouldn't mind if you did. I would like to be told when I do something wrong ;) Sadrul |
|
From: Nathan W. <fac...@fa...> - 2006-10-10 11:49:36
|
Mark Doliner wrote: > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer > status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. I mean, I > guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very often anymore, but he > is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. > > I was against giving him CVS access many moons ago because I felt like some of > his patches were shots in the dark, and I still get that vibe a little bit... > but I think he's done a lot of good work, and we could use more active devs. > > What do other people think? > > -Mark > > +1 -Nathan |
|
From: Daniel A. <dan...@gm...> - 2006-10-10 12:32:21
|
On 10/10/06, Mark Doliner <ma...@ki...> wrote: > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer > status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. I mean, I > guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very often anymore, but he > is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. I definitely agree. He's been doing a great job. |
|
From: Evan S. <ev...@dr...> - 2006-10-10 13:22:39
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On Oct 10, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Mark Doliner wrote: > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full > developer > status? > What do other people think? Full support. -Evan |
|
From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2006-10-10 13:39:19
|
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 11:24:49PM -0500, Mark Doliner wrote: > Hey, how do people feel about officially promoting sadrul to full developer > status? He's basically already there, except for the recognition. I mean, I > guess he doesn't change the Gaim core or gtk code very often anymore, but he > is basically the lead dev for gnt Gaim. > > I was against giving him CVS access many moons ago because I felt like some of > his patches were shots in the dark, and I still get that vibe a little bit... > but I think he's done a lot of good work, and we could use more active devs. > > What do other people think? > > -Mark Naturally someone in charge of a major component should be a full developer. Add him to the about and contactinfo :-) luke |