Re: [Gaim-cabal] smileys

[Sean E. <sea...@gm...>]

On 9/11/06, Nathan Walp <fac...@fa...> wrote:
> I'm not opposed to this idea (I'll wait until I see it for real for
> that), but I am worried that using emblems like that will cause more
> truncation (of both the name and the away message) than we really want.

Look at your buddy list. Count how many people have even a single
non-status emblem. Consider that our blist layout currently allows us
to "overlap" columns. That is, having emblems to the right won't
truncate people who don't have emblems.

-s.