|
From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2006-08-26 11:33:54
|
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:38:08PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > I've expressed at least some of this before, but... I see this effort as > having a couple benefits, aside from being free of copyright/trademark > problems. > > First, I'd love to see a smiley theme where a :) looks the same across > all protocols, a ;) is the same, an icon of "money" is the same, etc. We > should have one icon for each idea. I'm a big believer in the value of > abstracting protocol differences. > > Second, we can come up with something that is uniquely "Pidgin", as > opposed to near-direct (or direct) rip-offs of the official clients. > This should help our general image... Pidgin will look nice & polished. > > Richard > I find this argument persuasive, even for the smileys, where I would normally suggest we stay closer to each protocol. This could help people understand that pidgin is not AIM, or MSN, and that their defaults and behaviors do not create a requirement that we do the same. It could also help pidgin _feel_ more like a multi-protocol multi-connection client, much the same way that our state changes have helped in that respect. luke |