Re: [Gaim-cabal] bug trackers

[Mark D. <ma...@ki...>]

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:22:34 -0400, Luke Schierer wrote
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:32:49PM -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote:
> > 
> > I have grown to be a big fan of integrated VCS/issue tracker, and I've
> > never even actually used one.  ;-)  It just seems like so clearly the
> > Right Idea that I can't believe how long it's taken to come around ...
> > maybe I'll find that it's not all it's cracked up to be in practice,
> > but I think this is a bonus for trac, myself.
> > 
> > That said, you're our heaviest issue tracker user, and that certainly
> > carries some weight in the decision process.
> > 
> > Ethan
> 
> I want to pick something that will be more used than the SF trackers
> are, something that you all will be willing to interact with.  If
> that means it is slightly less ideal for me, the end result would
> still be a big win for me, as tracker items would actually be closed,
> merged, and so on regularly and consistently.  For that reason I've
> asked for opinions rather than just waiting to have my grubby hands
> at a command prompt and experimenting.  Though it might come to that
> anyway, if for example I go to install one of them and find that its
> confusing me to no end.
> 
> luke

Sounds like sourceforge and bugzilla have been eliminated.  Between RT and
Trac I vote for Trac.

It's possible that Fogcreek would license FogBugz to us for free, but even if
they did I think I'd still vote for Trac.  The FogBugz website says, "Academic
and Non Profit Organizations - Please contact us via email."

-Mark