[Gaim-patches] [ gaim-Patches-1099551 ] Stealth options in Yahoo!

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #1099551, was opened at 2005-01-11 03:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bleeter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1099551&group_id=235

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: newfeature
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Piotr P. Karwasz (piotrkar)
Assigned to: Tim Ringenbach (marv_sf)
Summary: Stealth options in Yahoo!

Initial Comment:
This is a dirty patch to show how the new per-contact
stealth options could be used in Gaim. It's againts
gaim-1.1.1
The packets used to hide from a contact are:

Client question:
service = 185 (0xb9)
status = 0
1 = name of client account
31 = 1 or 2 (1 means never show your status to the
contact even after a logout, 2 means show normally your
status to the contact)
7 = name of the contact to hide from

Server reponse:
service = 185
status = 1
31 = same as in the client question
13 = 2
66 = 0
7 = name of the contact

The patch adds an option in the account specific
options that hides your status from people that are
offline (or invisible) and shows it only to those who
are online.

I don't like to show when I am online to people that
never do the same and I think I am not the only one.

I looked only for 10 minutes to gaim code so the patch
is not too clean, though I think it's better than a
feature request.

Chopinhauer

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bleeter Yaluser (bleeter)
Date: 2005-06-29 07:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=407708

Head has recently had a 'stealth' option added to it.
Although the UI selector for stealth is very good, the
visual display is still wanting. Personally, I'd decline
this patch in preference for what's in HEAD as it's  a lot
more advanced than this, imo

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Ringenbach (marv_sf)
Date: 2005-01-11 09:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790708

Cool, I've been meaning to do this for some time. When I
look at the patch in more detail I'll give more specific
comments, if needed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1099551&group_id=235