|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-06-01 00:44:16
|
Patches item #1206366, was opened at 2005-05-21 21:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mr_person You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1206366&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curtis Hawthorne (mr_person) Assigned to: Sean Egan (seanegan) Summary: gaim-remote Custom Away Message Patch Initial Comment: This patch allows the user to input an custom away message on the command line using gaim-remote instead of only allowing the default away message to be shown. I think this will be really useful for people who want to automate their away status with scripts. This closes feature request 1030471. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Curtis Hawthorne (mr_person) Date: 2005-05-31 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173996 Added an updated patch that works against HEAD. The only problems I know of with it are that the GUI does not get updated (not sure how that's supposed to happen, or if it's even possible yet), and I'm not certain that it uses the default away message if one isn't specified. Other than that, it should be good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Curtis Hawthorne (mr_person) Date: 2005-05-24 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=173996 Yes, the patch is for oldstatus, sorry about that. I talked to someone on the IRC channel and was under the impression that oldstatus was the branch I should patch. I'll checkout HEAD and make any changes neccesarry. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Doliner (thekingant) Date: 2005-05-23 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=20979 I guess this is for oldstatus? I'd rather not add functionality for this and then have to change it once 2.0 is released. I'd much rather have the interface be added to only 2.0 (CVS HEAD). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1206366&group_id=235 |