[Gaim-patches] [ gaim-Patches-1067060 ] gaim.spec fixes for x86_64 on SUSE 9.2

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #1067060, was opened at 2004-11-15 19:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nosnilmot
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1067060&group_id=235

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Mahoney (jdmahoney)
Assigned to: Stu Tomlinson (nosnilmot)
Summary: gaim.spec fixes for x86_64 on SUSE 9.2

Initial Comment:
The spec file isn't quite correct for 64 bit systems.
There are a few places where the assumption that
libraries are under /usr/lib when that assumption is
invalid on 64-bit systems.

The attached fix worked for me. Might someone with an
x86_64 system running some other RPM-based distribution
verify that it works for them?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Stu Tomlinson (nosnilmot)
Date: 2005-04-28 13:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=309779

I added conditional defines for perl_vendorlib and
perl_archlib (and various other unrelated changes to the
spec file), and applied your patch. Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stu Tomlinson (nosnilmot)
Date: 2005-04-24 18:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=309779

A patch as described by Mark is still welcome, but I do plan
to look at this soon, so I don't think it should be closed yet.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Doliner (thekingant)
Date: 2005-04-24 17:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=20979

I'm not comfortable making this change in light of
nosnilmot's comments.  If you still feel a change like this
is necessary, can you provide a patch that defines
perl_vendorlib if necessary?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jeff Mahoney (jdmahoney)
Date: 2004-11-20 12:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=804735

Yes, %{_libdir} does respond to /usr/lib64. On my system,
which I can only assume conforms to LHS, perl modules live
under /usr/lib. This is also apparently true on Gentoo (or
so I've been told).

At any rate:
%perl_vendorlib         %(perl -V:vendorlib | sed
"s!.*='!!;s!'.*!!")
... is the expansion for perl_vendorlib.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stu Tomlinson (nosnilmot)
Date: 2004-11-20 12:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=309779

Some RPM based distros don't have a %{perl_vendorlib} macro.
I don't quite understand what the problem is either, as
%{_libdir} should expand to the correct place for 64bit
arches (/usr/lib64 on Fedora at least).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1067060&group_id=235