|
From: Richard H. <rm...@ap...> - 2003-04-02 16:32:52
|
Scott Henson <deb...@si...> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 10:52, Ethan Blanton wrote:
>> That is very much an opinion ... and one I am inclined to disagree
>> with. Since we have CVS logs to track commit-by-commit changes
>> (although the commit messages are not always what they could be), I
>> don't see any need to duplicate that information. I like to see major
>> changes since the last release when I look at a ChangeLog.
> Maybe starting to archive it on the web somewhere would be nice. Im not
> sure what the volume on it is, but I would rather not add another list
> to my mailbox. Also if it was archived it would be much simpler to go
> back and track the changes instead of having to keep every commit
> message.
Perhaps interface changes can be discussed on this list as well. That
doesn't seem to be happening, and when a user asks a question about
them here, they get the stock "it's CVS. Things change. Deal with
it. Read the Logs."
Which, of course, are after the fact. (Still hoping the input on top
is an April Fools change.)
--
Lift me down, so I can make the Earth tremble.
--Bucky Katt
|