| 
      
      
      From: Ethan B. <ebl...@cs...> - 2003-04-02 15:52:23
      
     | 
| Morten Brix Pedersen spake unto us the following wisdom:
> * Luke Schierer <lsc...@us...> [2003-04-02 14:34:19]:
> > true, but many commits are fixing bugs that didn't exist in the previou=
s=20
> > version, and thus aren't _changes_.  or fixing bugs in a feature that h=
as=20
> > been added since the last version, but didn't work perfectly the first =
time=20
> > it was committed, and noted in the changelog. its these, the majority o=
f=20
> > commits, that make the changelog painful on a commit-by-commit basis.
> > luke
>=20
> The ChangeLog is not meant to track changes between releases. Its meant
> to track code changes. The NEWS file is used to track changes betweeen
> releases.
That is very much an opinion ... and one I am inclined to disagree
with.  Since we have CVS logs to track commit-by-commit changes
(although the commit messages are not always what they could be), I
don't see any need to duplicate that information.  I like to see major
changes since the last release when I look at a ChangeLog.
Ethan
--=20
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will
look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the
blackest."
                -- Mahatma Gandhi
 |