From: Ethan B. <ebl...@cs...> - 2002-12-24 19:46:20
|
Robert Love spake unto us the following wisdom: > On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 14:09, Luke Schierer wrote: > > As i said in a previous post, these comments are not directed towards= =20 > > rejecting the patch. they are directed towards explaining why it is not= =20 > > a priority. i have niether the authority to accept or commit a patch=20 > > adding an option like this.=20 >=20 > Why does priority matter? It has already been written. In the meantime, why not just apply his patch to your own tree? As you say, it is already written... CVS handles this (reasonably) gracefully, so you can even continue to track CVS. Ethan --=20 And if I claim to be a wise man / it surely means that I don't know. -- Kansas, "Carry on Wayward Son" |