From: Felipe C. <al5...@ma...> - 2002-11-08 17:00:39
|
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:22:54AM -0500, lsc...@re... wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:20:07AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:06:27PM -0500, Luke Schierer wrote: > > > Doing things on a per-buddy basis will be far easier when the xml blist > > > is in place. untill then, it would have to be added by adding fields to > > > the existing format, and re-writting the parser only to re-write it > > > again as we move to the xml based blist. > > > luke > > > > I'm not talking about a lot of per-buddy functionality. This is the way I > > touhgt it should be done: > > > > If I have an alias specified in my .blist file, then that alias should be > > used, if not, then the nick should be automatically updates. As easy as > > that. > > > > That is talking about automatic nick updates, but independently of that I > > think a tooltip showing the remote nick whould help a lot. > > that friendly name goes into the alias feild. if you auto-update it once, you > will then have an alias, and it will not be updated again. how then would this > add anything? That has to be changed, the friendly name should go on another field, let's say 'remote_alias', the 'alias' is never auto-updated, you specify it or not. -- Felipe Contreras |