From: <lsc...@re...> - 2002-11-08 16:22:57
|
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:20:07AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:06:27PM -0500, Luke Schierer wrote: > > Doing things on a per-buddy basis will be far easier when the xml blist > > is in place. untill then, it would have to be added by adding fields to > > the existing format, and re-writting the parser only to re-write it > > again as we move to the xml based blist. > > luke > > I'm not talking about a lot of per-buddy functionality. This is the way I > touhgt it should be done: > > If I have an alias specified in my .blist file, then that alias should be > used, if not, then the nick should be automatically updates. As easy as > that. > > That is talking about automatic nick updates, but independently of that I > think a tooltip showing the remote nick whould help a lot. that friendly name goes into the alias feild. if you auto-update it once, you will then have an alias, and it will not be updated again. how then would this add anything? luke -- -This email is made of 100% recycled electrons. |