Re: [Gaim-devel] A question and an offer, re: MSN functionality

[Kris N. <kri...@kh...>]

Well, seeing as how that's exactly how it works (Text sent is prefaced
by AUTORESPONSE) with the AIM protocol, it really shouldn't be a big
issue (Wow, listen to the non-programmer talk about ease of
implementation!!!) to add that back in. I've already patched my version,
and will be testing it out as soon as my WinDoze box sees fit to boot.

Should someone file on official feature request?

Kris

On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 08:25, Lenny Maiorani wrote:
> This is something I have thought I would like as well, but there should 
> definitely be some text saying this is an auto response in front of the 
> message... Maybe when people see this they will be enticed to ask about 
> it and we can all advocate Gaim to them...or Gaim for Windows!
> 
> Lenny
> 
> 
> Luke Schierer wrote:
> >>If Luke's right, and you do indeed mean an autoresponse on MSN, Gaim
> >>used to do that, but purposely disabled it.  MSN users tend not to
> >>expect responses when you're away and it confuses then when they IM you
> >>and get one response back and then nothing--at least it does in my
> >>experience.
> > 
> > 
> > i tend to agree that its confusing on those protocols that don't have a means 
> > to identify an auto responce, but perhaps we could insert some text in those 
> > cases? or make auto-replying optional for them? 
> > luke
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Gaim-devel mailing list
> Gai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-devel
> 
>