From: Christian H. <ch...@gn...> - 2002-09-19 02:48:04
|
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:42:23PM -0400, William T. Mahan wrote: > Luke, > > Thanks for replying so quickly. > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:54:35PM -0400, Luke Schierer wrote: > > > > yeah! someone who listened and did a generic interface!. > > It was in the FAQ. :-) Woah! Somebody read the FAQ! > Are you implying that other people have already implemented the same > thing? It seemed to me that separating the GTK was a relatively > small part of the effort required. Do you know of any other patches > that I might want to compare wth? People have tried, but nobody ever finished one. I don't know if their work was released, either. > > please post a patch to www.sf.net/projects/gaim, and i'll direct > > interested parties to try it and send you comments. i do not > > promise, will not promise that a developer will look at > > Done, thanks. > > > it or merge it in soon, chances are that won't be the case, but > > you will get the comments > > Well, I wasn't looking to have it merged yet (it could be much more > robust). But if for some reason this type of patch would never be > accepted, then I would like to hear about it. I think it would be accepted if it worked right and followed our requirements (UI/protocol separation). If you think it's off to a good start, by all means, continue :) Christian -- Christian Hammond <> The GNUpdate Project ch...@gn... <> http://www.gnupdate.org/ "Oh, so you're defending yourself, you coward!" - Peter Lorre |