From: Richard L. <rl...@wi...> - 2006-11-06 01:55:21
|
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 13:23 +0100, Gabor Kelemen wrote: > Only problem can be it's availability in major distributions,=20 > Distrowatch says it's available only in the most current versions. > However, as a translator, i think the gettext functions are the best=20 > solution (and not the ugly hacks like glib's Q macro or custom made=20 > implementations), as gettext-based translation support systems, like=20 > KBabel, Launchpad's Rosetta or Pootle will provide proper support for thi= s. If it were just an issue of run-time function calls, I'd suggest a wrapper function IFF gettext doesn't have the right function. However, I suspect that the translation extraction tools would miss translations where we call the_new_gettext_function() instead of _() (which of course maps to gettext). Maybe we could teach intltool-extract about the new formats? Maybe that's already been done? Richard |