Re: [Gaim-i18n] Order and Priority

[Ambrose Li <ac...@ad...>]

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:59:48AM +0300, Shalom Craimer wrote:

> Obviously, "ui_requirement" is very important. But how
> important is it?  More important than "name"?

I never thought about this. But then now that I realize it might
have some relation to importance, I quickly took a glance of the
po file.

The result... no, "ui_requirement" is *not* a good indication of
importance; there are many important strings without this flag.

> My point is this: Given that I doubt I have the energy do
> really get everything done, what should I do first? What is
> most critical to get done so people can use Gaim?

The way I'd go about it would be just to bring up gaim and see
what is on the screen. If it's in English when it shouldn't be,
or if it's wrong and bugs me, it obviously is important :-)

However, this obviously would not work for the current CVS
version (HEAD), so I guess I'll just take guesses on whether
it looks like something I would easily see; if it looks like
there's a high chance I'd see it it's probably important.

Also, most of the protocol-specific error messages can be
treated as "not important for the time being" (if those are
among the untranslated strings). They are quite difficult to
translate and most of them are very rarely seen.

Regards,
Ambrose