Re: [Gaim-i18n] Re: [Gaim-i18n] Re: [Bug 144621] Norwegian bokm?l translation is placed in wrong directory

[Clytie S. <cl...@ri...>]

On 01/03/2005, at 3:31 PM, Ambrose Li wrote:

> This seems to be a new standard. The old copy of iso 639 codes
> that I had downloaded some years ago did not distinguish between
> the two Norwegian dialects.

Yes, this is version 0.45, which oddly enough, wasn't the current=20
version at umontreal's Translation Project when I went to translate=20
them. I queried something with the developer in charge, and he sent us=20=

the current files. Karl still hasn't had time to update the listing, so=20=

I can't submit them yet. :(
>
> According to http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/englangn.html
> the corresponding two-letter codes are
>
> nno =3D nn
> nob =3D nb
> nor =3D no

Yes, that would be right.
>
> I looked at the Gnome Translation Project site; they have split
> no into nb and nn, so I guess it might be a reasonable request.

I think this is a developing feature now we're moving (we hope) into=20
true i18n. If enough volunteers exist to do the work, each language may=20=

wish to declare dialectical variants. If mine does, I think I'll have a=20=

quiet nervous breakdown in the corner... ;)   (three main regions, and=20=

a host of minor ethnic groups!)

from Clytie (vi-VN, team/nh=C3=B3m Gnome-vi)

Clytie Siddall--Renmark, in the Riverland of South Australia

=E1=BB=9E th=C3=A0nh ph=E1=BB=91 Renmark, t=E1=BA=A1i mi=E1=BB=81n s=C3=B4=
ng c=E1=BB=A7a Nam =C3=9Ac=