From: Evan S. <ev...@ad...> - 2007-03-31 20:43:12
|
On Mar 31, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Christopher O'Brien wrote: > On Mar 31, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Evan Schoenberg wrote: >> Agreed that that's a necessity. So far as I can tell in cursory >> testing, sending any sort of invalid XML can drive iChat crazy >> (chat ended, further chatting can't be initiated by iChat but can >> still be done if the sending-invalid-XML side initiates the >> conversation)... but it seems to ignore valid but nonsensical XML. > > I think you mean "not well-formed" instead of "invalid", and > "invalid" instead of "nonsensical?" "Valid" specifically means that > it validates to a schema, and "well-formed" specifically means it > can be correctly parsed as XML. Ah, thank you - I'm not (yet) up on my XML terminology Yes, that's exactly what I mean. iChat doesn't handle not well-formed XML elegantly, but it does properly respond to well-formed invalid XML. -Evan |