|
From: Mark S. <que...@gm...> - 2007-03-07 00:11:01
|
On 3/6/07, Sean Egan <sea...@gm...> wrote: > On 3/6/07, Charles Acknin <cha...@gm...> wrote: > > Then I guess it's fine. Plugin's name and description are clear enough, > > aren't they? > > You overestimate people. People make this exact complaint regularly. > Every couple of weeks. If nobody is actually using this plugin, and > all it's doing is confusing people who loaded it because they don't > know what "iconify" means, it's doing more harm than good. > > -s. I actually use the plugin. However, i would not be against it if you decided to remove the plugin from the default gaim build. That is to say, i would appreciate keeping the code around and current, but perhaps making it a --enable autoconf option. Frankly, i think the plugin name and description should be enough to keep people from enabling it, but perhaps if people are being confused by the name and description, then the problem could be solved there through renaming and clarification rather than complete removal of the plugin. -2 pennies from me to you |