From: Mark D. <ma...@ki...> - 2006-08-22 06:18:37
|
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:45:22 -0700, Sean Egan wrote > On 8/21/06, Ethan Blanton <ebl...@cs...> wrote: > > I remain in opposition to this change, on the principle that it is bad > > design, but I am not going to get in a long debate over it; if no one > > else understands or cares that it's bad design, then let it be bad > > design. In this instance, the complexity of the code in the > > subservient thread can be kept under control such that the usual > > concerns about threading behavior can be minimized. > > Probably no surprise to anyone, I agree with Ethan. > > Considering the DNS lookup code is already written, tested, and > stable, I see no compelling reason to screw around with it too much > now, but I'm not too particularly concerned. > > Really, we should just extend our SRV lookup code to handle A records > asynchronously. > > -s. I reverted those changes in SVN, so we're back to having three large chunks of code that do the same thing. -Mark |